Search Results

Showing 37-48 of 67

  • insight Apr 2016

    Oh for the Love of Sticky Notes! The Changing Role of Evaluators Who Work with Foundations

    Julia Coffman, founder of the Center for Evaluation Innovation, illustrates evaluators’ changing roles in the context of her own experiences as a long-time evaluator in philanthropy. This article published on Medium examines the history of evaluation in philanthropy, and the implications of role changes for evaluator skills, expertise, and boundaries.

    By Julia Coffman

    Oh for the Love of Sticky Notes! The Changing Role of Evaluators Who Work with Foundations
  • publication Jan 2016

    The Shaping of Evaluation at the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

    This teaching case tells the story of the evolution of the evaluation function at the Hewlett Foundation from 2000 to 2015. It is as much the story of how one foundation’s culture shaped that evolution as it is how key leaders influenced the use of evaluation.

    The Shaping of Evaluation at the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • publication Jul 2015

    Network Evaluation in Practice: Approaches and Applications

    What are success factors in building a network? What should funders support when they design network grants? How can network builders and funders tell how well a network is doing? This Foundation Review article offers a three-pillar framework for evaluating networks focused on network connectivity, health, and results. 

    By Julia Coffman

    Network Evaluation in Practice: Approaches and Applications
  • publication Mar 2015

    Four Tools for Assessing Grantee Contribution to Advocacy Efforts

    Advocacy takes place in a complex and crowded political environment with many organizations trying to move policy on the same issue at the same time. This brief offers four tools that funders can use to get a better handle on a grantee’s contribution to an advocacy effort. 

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    Four Tools for Assessing Grantee Contribution to Advocacy Efforts
  • publication Sep 2014

    Assessing and Evaluating Change in Advocacy Fields

    Funders engaged in advocacy field building have different evaluation needs than those that aim to build specific advocacy capacities or advance a particular policy change. This resource brings together emerging ideas about how to assess advocacy fields and evaluate advocacy field-building initiatives. 

    Assessing and Evaluating Change in Advocacy Fields
  • publication Jul 2014

    First Among Equals: The Evaluation of the McConnell Foundation Social Innovation Generation Initiative

    This teaching case explores both the real and potential evaluation of a foundation strategy focused on social innovation in Canada. 

    First Among Equals: The Evaluation of the McConnell Foundation Social Innovation Generation Initiative
  • presentation Jul 2014

    Evaluation and Learning for Aligned Action: 2014 Evaluation Roundtable Convening

    This presentation provides the context for the 2014 Evaluation Roundtable convening, as well as discussion outlines, benchmarking data, case examples, and key lessons and implications for evaluation and learning. 

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    Evaluation and Learning for Aligned Action: 2014 Evaluation Roundtable Convening
  • publication Jul 2014

    Evaluating Networks for Social Change: A Casebook

    This casebook profiles nine evaluations of network effectiveness that are designed to fit with how networks develop and function.

    By Julia Coffman

    Evaluating Networks for Social Change: A Casebook
  • publication Jun 2014

    Evaluation and Learning for Complexity and Aligned Action: Framing Brief

    This framing brief developed for the 2014 Evaluation Roundtable convening explores whether and how sectoral shifts in strategy mindset and practice toward more complexity and emergence call for changes in the role of evaluation and learning in foundations. 

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    Evaluation and Learning for Complexity and Aligned Action: Framing Brief
  • publication May 2014

    How Shortcuts Cut Us Short: Cognitive Traps in Philanthropic Decision Making

    Decades of research have shown that despite the best of intentions, and even when actionable data are presented at the right time, people do not automatically make good and rational decisions. This brief highlights common cognitive traps that can trip up philanthropic decision making, and suggests straightforward steps to counter them. 

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    How Shortcuts Cut Us Short: Cognitive Traps in Philanthropic Decision Making
  • presentation Apr 2013

    Evaluation in Foundations: 2012 Benchmarking Data

    This presentation, developed for the 2012 Evaluation Roundtable convening, examines how foundations structure their evaluation and learning functions, invest in evaluative activities, and use evaluative information. Findings are based on surveys from 31 foundations with a strong commitment to evaluation – and 38 foundations that participated in interviews.

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    Evaluation in Foundations: 2012 Benchmarking Data
  • publication Jan 2013

    Benchmarking Evaluation in Foundations: Do We Know What We Are Doing?

    Evaluation in philanthropy--with staff assigned to evaluation-related responsibilities--began in the 1970s and has evolved, along with philanthropy, in the decades since. This Foundation Review article presents findings, based on 2012 research, about what foundations are doing on evaluation and discusses their implications.

    By Tanya Beer, Julia Coffman

    Benchmarking Evaluation in Foundations: Do We Know What We Are Doing?